Question Set

1. Which among the following leaders was instrumental in bringing the Extremists and the Moderates together at the Lucknow session of 1916 ?





Ask Your Doubts Here

Type in
(Press Ctrl+g to toggle between English and the chosen language)

Comments

Show Similar Question And Answers
QA->Who was instrumental in bringing the Extremists and the Moderates together at Lucknow?....
QA->Lucknow Pact was signed between extremists and moderates in?....
QA->In which session of Indian National Congress, the moderates and extremists sections of congress reunited?....
QA->The Indian National Congress split into two groups; extremists and moderates, at the Surat session in the year ?....
QA->A and B can do a work in 12 days B and C together can do it in 15 days and C and A together in 20 days. If A,B,C work together, they will complete the work in?....
MCQ->Which among the following leaders was instrumental in bringing the Extremists and the Moderates together at the Lucknow session of 1916 ?....
MCQ->The Lahore session of the Indian National Congress, 1929 is very important in history because: 1. Congress passed a resolution demanding complete independence 2. Rift between the extremists and moderates was resolved in that session 3. A resolution was passed rejecting the Two Nation theory in that session Which of the statements given above is/are correct?....
MCQ->The Lahore Session of the Indian National Congress (1929) is very important in history, because 1. the Congress passed a resolution demanding complete independence 2. the rift between the extremists and moderates was resolved in that session 3. a resolution was passed rejecting the two-nation theory in that Session Which of the statements given above is/are correct?....
MCQ->The Lucknow Session of INC and the Lucknow Pact (1916) were significant on account of?....
MCQ->Read the following passage carefully and choose the most appropriate answer to the question out of the four alternatives. A classless society, however, does not mean a society without leaders. It means rather one in which every citizen becomes for the first time eligible for leadership, if he has the power to lead. It means a society in which every one is given, as far as possible, the chance to develop this power by the widest diffusion of educational opportunities in the broadest sense, and by keeping the career wide open to talents of every useful kind. It is often said that a community of equals will not allow itself to be led. But in fact, most men are, in most things, very willing to be led, and more in danger of giving their leaders too much than too little authority, especially if they are free to choose them, and assured that the leaders cannot exploit them for personal economic advantage leadership, so far from disappearing, will come into its own in a truly democratic society. But it is likely to be a more diffused leadership than we are used to for a better-nurtured people will have more citizens with strong wills and minds of their own, wishful to lead some in politics, some in industry, and some in professions and arts of life. This is the idea of a classless society. Some will reject it as contrary to their interest, some as utopian and against 'Human nature,' for there are some who deny, indeed if not in word, that the aim of society should be to promote the greatest happiness and welfare of the greatest number and others who hold, with pessimistic honesty, that most men must be driven and not led. What is the tone adopted by the author in this passage?....
Terms And Service:We do not guarantee the accuracy of available data ..We Provide Information On Public Data.. Please consult an expert before using this data for commercial or personal use | Powered By:Omega Web Solutions
© 2002-2017 Omega Education PVT LTD...Privacy | Terms And Conditions
Question ANSWER With Solution