Question Set

1. The appropriate writ issued by the court to quash the appointment of a person to a public office is that of:?





Ask Your Doubts Here

Type in
(Press Ctrl+g to toggle between English and the chosen language)

Comments

Show Similar Question And Answers
QA->The appropriate writ issued by the court to quash the appointment of a person to a public office is that of:?....
QA->Which writ is issued by the court in case of illegal detention of a person?....
QA->Which writ is issued by the court in’ case of illegal detention of a person?....
QA->Which writ may be issued to enforce a Fundamental Right?....
QA->Which of the following Writs can be used against a person believed to be holding a public office he is not entitled to hold?....
MCQ->The appropriate writ issued by the court to quash the appointment of a person to a public office is that of:?....
MCQ->Which among the following conditions are necessary for the issue of writ of quo warranto:1. The office must be public and must be created by a Statute or by the Constitution itself. 2. The office must be a substantive one and not merely the function or employment of a servant at the will and during the pleasure of another. 3. There has been a contravention of the constitution or a Statutory Instrument, in appointing such person to that office. Select the correct answer using the code given below:Code:?....
MCQ->The writ of prohibition issued by Supreme Court or High court is issued against?....
MCQ->What will be the output of the program? public abstract class AbstractTest { public int getNum() { return 45; } public abstract class Bar { public int getNum() { return 38; } } public static void main (String [] args) { AbstractTest t = new AbstractTest() { public int getNum() { return 22; } }; AbstractTest.Bar f = t.new Bar() { public int getNum() { return 57; } }; System.out.println(f.getNum() + " " + t.getNum()); } }....
MCQ->In the 1966 Supreme Court decision Miranda v. Arizona, the court held that before the police can obtain statements from a person subjected to an interrogation, the person must be given a Miranda warning. This warning means that a person must be told that he or she has the right to remain silent during the police interrogation. Violation of this right means that any statement that the person makes is not admissible in a court hearing. This paragraph best supports the statement that....
Terms And Service:We do not guarantee the accuracy of available data ..We Provide Information On Public Data.. Please consult an expert before using this data for commercial or personal use | Powered By:Omega Web Solutions
© 2002-2017 Omega Education PVT LTD...Privacy | Terms And Conditions
Question ANSWER With Solution