It is suspected that the comparator in the figure given below has a problem. The inputs are activated in the table shown below and the corresponding outputs noted. What is most likely wrong with the circuit? For P0 – P3 = 1 and Q0 – Q3 ?->(Show Answer!)

Question Set

1. It is suspected that the comparator in the figure given below has a problem. The inputs are activated in the table shown below and the corresponding outputs noted. What is most likely wrong with the circuit? For P0 – P3 = 1 and Q0 – Q3 = 0, P > Q = 1, P = Q = 1, P < Q = 0 For P0 – P3 = 0 and Q0 – Q3 = 1, P > Q = 0, P = Q = 1, P < Q = 1 For P0 – P3 = 1 and Q0 – Q3 = 1, P > Q = 0, P = Q = 1, P < Q = 0

Show Similar Question And Answers

QA->A statement followed by two assumptions I and II is given. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Indicate which one of the four given alternatives is correct ? Statement : If more encouragement is given to Sports, Indians will win more gold medals at the Olympic Games. Assumptions : I. Indians do not win gold medals. II. More enc....

QA->If the central portion of a convex lens is wrapped in black paper as shown in the figure?....

QA->Late Girilal jain was a noted figure in which fields?....

QA->Late Girilal Jain was a noted figure in which field?....

QA->Hitendra Desai was a noted figure in which field?....

MCQ->It is suspected that the comparator in the figure given below has a problem. The inputs are activated in the table shown below and the corresponding outputs noted. What is most likely wrong with the circuit? For P0 – P3 = 1 and Q0 – Q3 = 0, P > Q = 1, P = Q = 1, P < Q = 0 For P0 – P3 = 0 and Q0 – Q3 = 1, P > Q = 0, P = Q = 1, P < Q = 1 For P0 – P3 = 1 and Q0 – Q3 = 1, P > Q = 0, P = Q = 1, P < Q = 0

MCQ->The RAM circuit given below is suspected of being bad. A check with a logic probe shows pulse activity on all of the address lines and data inputs. The / line and inputs are forced HIGH and the data output lines are checked with the logic probe. Q0, Q2, and Q3 show a dim indication on the logic probe; Q1 indicates a HIGH level on the logic probe. What, if anything, is wrong with the circuit?

MCQ->Assertion (A): In a magnitude comparator IC the cascading inputs provide a means to cascade the 4 bit comparators Reason (R): A magnitude comparator has three outputs, A = B, A > B and A < B

MCQ->Refer to the given figures (a) and (b). A logic analyzer is used to check the circuit in figure (a) and displays the waveforms shown in figure (b). The actual analyzer display shows all four data outputs, Q0-Q3. The analyzer's cursor is placed at position X and all four of the data output lines show a LOW level output. What is wrong, if anything, with the circuit?

MCQ->Consider the following statements a half adder. As a half subtractor alsohas two outputs CH = x x y and Sn = x ⊕ y for two inputs x and yhas two outputs CH = x + y and SH = x ⊕ y for two inputs x and yis a combinational circuit Which of the statements given above is/are correct?....

Terms And Service:We do not guarantee the accuracy of available data ..We Provide Information On Public Data.. Please consult an expert before using this data for commercial or personal use | Powered By:Omega Web Solutions
© 2002-2017 Omega Education PVT LTD...Privacy | Terms And Conditions Question ANSWER With Solution