1. The first indication that a stable nucleus can be broken down was afforded by?

Answer: Rutherford

Reply

Type in
(Press Ctrl+g to toggle between English and the chosen language)

Comments

Show Similar Question And Answers
QA->The first indication that a stable nucleus can be broken down was afforded by?....
QA->Reading of a barometer going down is an indication of?....
QA->In which process; a nucleus spontaneously breaks down by emitting radiation?....
QA->In which process, a nucleus spontaneously breaks down by emitting radiation?....
QA->A thing which can easily be broken....
MCQ->The first indication that a stable nucleus can be broken down was afforded by?...
MCQ->In order to comply with TRIPS Agreement, India enacted the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration Protection) Act, 1999. The difference/differences between a "Trade Mark" and a Geographical Indication is/are: 1. A Trade Mark is an individual or a company's right whereas a Geographical Indication is a community's right. 2. A Trade Mark can be licensed whereas a Geographical Indication cannot be licensed. 3. A Trade Mark is assigned to the manufactured goods whereas the Geographical Indication is assigned to the agricultural goods/products and handicrafts only. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?...
MCQ->Consider the following statements relating to the stability of floating as well as submerged bodies : 1. A submerged body is stable when the centre of gravity is below the centre of buoyancy. 2. A floating body is stable when the centre of gravity is above the centre of buoyancy. 3. A floating body is stable when the centre of gravity is below the metacentre. 4. A submerged body is in stable equilibrium when the centre of gravity coincides with the centre of buoyancy. Of these statements :...
MCQ->Statements : No proof is an evidence. No proof is an indication. Conclusions: I. All Indication being evidences is a possibility. II. No evidence is an indication....
MCQ->The transfer function of a discrete time LTI system is given by Consider the following statements: S1: The system is stable and causal for ROC: |z| > 1/2 S2: The system is stable but not causal for ROC: |z| < 1/4 S3: The system is neither stable nor causal for ROC: 1/4 < |z| < 1/2 Which one of the following statements is valid?...
Terms And Service:We do not guarantee the accuracy of available data ..We Provide Information On Public Data.. Please consult an expert before using this data for commercial or personal use | Powered By:Omega Web Solutions
© 2002-2017 Omega Education PVT LTD...Privacy | Terms And Conditions