Question Set

1. Which of the following leaders died in the battle field in the Revolt of 1857?





Ask Your Doubts Here

Type in
(Press Ctrl+g to toggle between English and the chosen language)

Comments

Show Similar Question And Answers
QA->A leading British Parliamentarian and politician admitted that the revolt of 1857 was a ‘National Revolt’ not a’ Military Mutiny’?....
QA->About the revolt of 1857 which leader pointed out in 1864 that “there was no popular outbreak;even the soldiers would not have mutinied but for the Meerut punishments. I, therefore, think that the mutiny of 1857 was not a popular rebellion”?....
QA->Which revolt is known as the first organised revolt against the English in Kerala?....
QA->Which revolt was the first organised revolt against British authority in Kerala?....
QA->Which place that lies between India and Pakistan is referred as the highest and the coldest battle field in the world?....
MCQ->Which of the following leaders died in the battle field in the Revolt of 1857?....
MCQ->Which of the following leaders died in the battle field in the Revolt of 1857 ?....
MCQ->After the initial success of the Revolt of 1857, the objective for which the leaders of the Revolt worked was?....
MCQ->Read the following passage carefully and choose the most appropriate answer to the question out of the four alternatives. But the war did not cease though friend and foe alike were almost drowned in blood. It seemed as powerful as eternity, and in time Tony Vassall too went to battle and was killed. The country gave Patience a widow's pension, as well a touching inducement to marry again she died of grief. Many people died in those days, it was not strange at all. Nathan and his wife got so rich that after the war they died of overeating, and their daughter Olive came into a vast fortune and a Trustee. Olive, after her parents' death became....
MCQ->Read the following passage carefully and choose the most appropriate answer to the question out of the four alternatives. A classless society, however, does not mean a society without leaders. It means rather one in which every citizen becomes for the first time eligible for leadership, if he has the power to lead. It means a society in which every one is given, as far as possible, the chance to develop this power by the widest diffusion of educational opportunities in the broadest sense, and by keeping the career wide open to talents of every useful kind. It is often said that a community of equals will not allow itself to be led. But in fact, most men are, in most things, very willing to be led, and more in danger of giving their leaders too much than too little authority, especially if they are free to choose them, and assured that the leaders cannot exploit them for personal economic advantage leadership, so far from disappearing, will come into its own in a truly democratic society. But it is likely to be a more diffused leadership than we are used to for a better-nurtured people will have more citizens with strong wills and minds of their own, wishful to lead some in politics, some in industry, and some in professions and arts of life. This is the idea of a classless society. Some will reject it as contrary to their interest, some as utopian and against 'Human nature,' for there are some who deny, indeed if not in word, that the aim of society should be to promote the greatest happiness and welfare of the greatest number and others who hold, with pessimistic honesty, that most men must be driven and not led. What is the tone adopted by the author in this passage?....
Terms And Service:We do not guarantee the accuracy of available data ..We Provide Information On Public Data.. Please consult an expert before using this data for commercial or personal use | Powered By:Omega Web Solutions
© 2002-2017 Omega Education PVT LTD...Privacy | Terms And Conditions
Question ANSWER With Solution