1. Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India? Arguments: Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.






Ask Your Doubts Here

Type in
(Press Ctrl+g to toggle between English and the chosen language)

Comments

  • By: guest on 02 Jun 2017 01.29 am
    Clearly, the luxury hotels are a mark of country's standard and a place for staying for the affluent foreign tourists. So, argument II holds. Argument I is not a strong reason because ban on hotels is not a way to do away with the activities of international criminals.
Show Similar Question And Answers
QA->A statement followed by two assumptions I and II is given. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Indicate which one of the four given alternatives is correct ? Statement : If more encouragement is given to Sports, Indians will win more gold medals at the Olympic Games. Assumptions : I. Indians do not win gold medals. II. More enc....
QA->Two statements are given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which one of the given conclusions is definitely drawn from the given statements. Statement : All virtuous persons are happy. No unhappy person is virtuous. Conclusions : I. Happiness is related to virtue II. Unhappy person is not virtuous.....
QA->Which international organisation recently urged the international community to co-operate with India in dealing with terrorism?....
QA->‘I have been touring different parts of the world. During these travels, I have had the good fortune to come into contact with several saints and maharshis. But I have frankly to admit that I have never come across one who is spiritually greater than Swami Sree Narayana Guru of Kerala” Whose words are these?....
QA->Recently, India has been invited to 46th session of foreign ministers OIC. In this context, which of the following is not a correct statement?....
MCQ->Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India? Arguments: Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.

....
MCQ->Statement : Should luxury hotels be banned in India ? Arguments : I. Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate. II. No. Affluent tourist will have no place to stay.....
MCQ->Statements: All terrorists are guilty. All terrorists are criminals. Conclusions: Either all criminals are guilty or all guilty are criminals. Some guilty persons are criminals. Generally criminals are guilty. Crime and guilt go together.

....
MCQ->Statement: The Government of India has set up one-stop facilitation counters manned by trained staff for attending to various needs of the foreign tourists at all the international airports. Assumptions: There is adequate trained staff available to man these counters in shifts. The services provided by these counters will help boosting inflow of foreign tourists. Majority of the foreign tourists need variety of services when they reach India.

....
MCQ->(1) Looting is a crime. (2) Some crooked people are criminals. (3) All those involved in looting are criminals. (4) Some crooked people are involved in looting. (5) All criminals are looked down in society. (6) Some crooked people are not criminals.....
Terms And Service:We do not guarantee the accuracy of available data ..We Provide Information On Public Data.. Please consult an expert before using this data for commercial or personal use | Powered By:Omega Web Solutions
© 2002-2017 Omega Education PVT LTD...Privacy | Terms And Conditions
Question ANSWER With Solution